#The syndicate project zombies story how to#
#The syndicate project zombies story drivers#
#The syndicate project zombies story license#

The crops and animal breeds that feed humanity co-evolved with human farming communities over the course of millennia. Our food systems are a prime example of why we need a different approach. Governments are required to hold these entities accountable for the damage they cause to the environment and human communities, and to protect the rights of indigenous peoples, smallholder farmers, and others who have long helped protect the world’s precious ecosystems.

#The syndicate project zombies story drivers#

It shows that we need to address the drivers of biodiversity loss – extractive and industrial activities – rather than entrusting protection of the world’s ecosystems to corporations and financial markets. The goal should be to achieve human and ecosystems’ well-being, not shareholder value.Ī human-rights lens sharpens the focus on those people and communities who are most affected by today’s destructive practices. Doing so acknowledges that human societies and natural ecosystems are inextricably connected, and that biodiversity protection requires a shift to more sustainable social and economic models.

Governments need to look beyond “30x30” and “nature-based solutions” to put human rights at the center of the Global Biodiversity Framework.

#The syndicate project zombies story license#

Rather than a remedy, “nature-based solutions” are becoming part of the problem, serving as a license for business as usual, or even encouraging more land grabs in areas traditionally managed by indigenous peoples and local communities. Those who use the term seldom refer to human rights and tend to focus instead on offsetting schemes, such as carbon markets, which tie the protection of biodiversity in one place to its ongoing destruction elsewhere. The concept has a nice ring to it, and it has been endorsed by the UN Environment Assembly. In “green” business and financial circles, the current buzz is about “ nature-based solutions,” a term used to describe interventions ranging from reforestation to carbon markets. Instead of ensuring that industrial and financial activities are regulated to avoid harming people and the planet, the current proposals focus on trying to transform the biodiversity crisis into another opportunity to boost corporate profits. The second flawed premise guiding today’s negotiations is that protecting biodiversity must be turned into a business.

#The syndicate project zombies story how to#

Join us on September 14 for our next virtual event, Forsaken Futures, to hear leading global experts discuss how to leverage public policy, finance, and technology to mitigate the dangers of a hotter world. By deploying such strategies, governments risk sidelining precisely the people who live closest to the ecosystems that we are trying to protect, and who play a critical role in sustainably managing those resources to preserve their own livelihoods. Hence, most of the focus today is on the “ 30x30” campaign to establish formal protections for 30% of all land and marine areas by 2030.īut this “fortress conservation” approach has already been tried, and it was shown to lead to systematic violations of local communities’ rights. The first is the assumption that human societies and ecosystems exist separately from one another, implying that the best way to conserve biodiversity is to carve out protected areas that exclude all human activity. But very little progress was made at the most recent round of talks in June, and though there is a global consensus on the urgent need to act, the current debate is based on two dangerously mistaken premises. All are in urgent need of protection.įor the past few years, governments have been negotiating a new Global Biodiversity Framework under the auspices of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. The region is estimated to be home to 12,000 plant species – 35% of which grow nowhere else in the world – as well as around 25 million people, including indigenous peoples, smallholder farmers, and other communities where traditional livelihoods depend on biodiversity. The Cerrado is a tragic and alarming example of how quickly the world’s biological diversity is being lost. Agribusinesses have dispossessed thousands of communities in land grabs and destroyed the surrounding environment. And in recent decades, 40-55% of the Cerrado biome has been converted to croplands, pastures, and tree plantations, with much of the deforestation making way for large industrial soy monocultures and cattle production. In 2021 alone, 8,531 square kilometers (3,294 square miles) of the Cerrado’s forests, grasslands, and other native vegetation were destroyed – the highest rate since 2015.